Linguistic Practice and False-belief Tasks

Mind and Language 25 (3):298-328 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Jill de Villiers has argued that children's mastery of sentential complements plays a crucial role in enabling them to succeed at false-belief tasks. Josef Perner has disputed that and has argued that mastery of false-belief tasks requires an understanding of the multiplicity of perspectives. This paper attempts to resolve the debate by explicating attributions of desires and beliefs as extensions of the linguistic practices of making commands and assertions, respectively. In terms of these linguistic practices one can explain why desire-talk will precede belief-talk and why even older children will have difficulty attributing incompatible desires

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,391

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-06-01

Downloads
30 (#391,727)

6 months
1 (#451,971)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matthew Van Cleave
Lansing Community College

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references