Studia Logica 42 (2-3):299-313 (1983)
Exact philosophy consists of various disciplines scattered and separated. Formal semantics and philosophy of science are good examples of two such disciplines. The aim of this paper is to show that there is possible to find some integrating bridge topics between the two fields, and to show how insights from the one are illuminating and suggestive in the other.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
The logical structure of mathematical physics.J. D. Sneed - 1975 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 37 (1):151-152.
A Mathematical Characterization of Interpretation Between Theories.van Benthem Johan & Pearce David - 1984 - Studia Logica 43 (3):295-303.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Coreference and Modality.Martin Stokhof, Jeroen Groenendijk & Frank Veltman - 1996 - In Shalom Lappin (ed.), Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. Blackwell. pp. 179-216.
Logic: Normative or Descriptive? The Ethics of Belief or a Branch of Psychology?Michael D. Resnik - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (2):221-238.
Could Semantics Be Something Else? Philosophical Challenges for Formal Semantics.Martin Stokhof - manuscript
Hand or Hammer? On Formal and Natural Languages in Semantics.Martin Stokhof - 2008 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 35 (5):597-626.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #185,030 of 2,152,252 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #119,603 of 2,152,252 )
How can I increase my downloads?