Miracle Reports, Moral Philosophy, and Contemporary Science

Dissertation, University of Waterloo (Canada) (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the case of miracle reports, David Hume famously argued that there is something about "the very nature of the fact" to which the testimony testifies which contains the seeds of the testimony's destruction as credible evidence. The Humean idea, still held by several important contemporary philosophers, is that the very concept of miracle has logical implications for the world, these implications make a miracle extremely improbable, and so, at least for thinking people, reports of a miracle's occurrence are rendered unbelievable. Hume and apparently some of his contemporary disciples view this feature of miracle reports as an "everlasting check" against reasonable belief in reports of any miracle's occurrence. ;At the risk of seeming unfair to Hume, but taking seriously Hume and company's apparent judgment that the Humean argument is at least a present day check on miracle reports, this dissertation transfers the heart of the Humean argument into the present and it makes a case for thinking that, today, the Humean argument backfires . In this dissertation a close conceptual look is taken of the "very nature" of the miraculous object of a miracle testimony, a very nature paradigmatically given to us in the reports of Jesus' miraculous resurrection and virgin birth; and then an examination occurs of the logical implications of this conceptual analysis in the context of what science tells us is reasonable to believe about the world at the beginning of the 21 st century, and in the context of what some moral philosophizing allows us to reasonably believe as well. The result, this dissertation contends, is that, contrary to what Hume and company think, the concept of miracle contains the seeds not for weakening the credibility of a miracle testimony but for strengthening it. ;The thesis of this dissertation is the following: On the specification of a miracle concept that is comprehensive enough to capture such paradigm cases as Jesus' allegedly miraculous resurrection and virgin birth , certain features of this concept's metaphysical and moral implications---when examined in the context of some implied/predicted findings from contemporary science plus some implied/predicted discernments from moral philosophy---serve to enhance the plausibility of a hypothesis which employs the miracle concept to describe the operation of a theoretical causal entity or power to make sense of some facts which suggest such an operation

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hume’s Scale.Hendrik van der Breggen - 2002 - Philosophia Christi 4 (2):443 - 453.
Hume's Fallacy.K. Rao - 1981 - Journal of Parapsychology 45.
Miracles.J. Kellenberger - 1979 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10 (3):145 - 162.
Miracles: A Philosophical Analysis.Robert Sloan Lee - 2004 - Dissertation, Wayne State University
Hume's Evidential/Testimonial Epistemology, Probability, and Miracles.Francis J. Beckwith - 1991 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 12:87 - 104.
A New Interpretation of Hume's 'Of Miracles'.Chris Slupik - 1995 - Religious Studies 31 (4):517 - 536.
God, Nature, and the Concept of Miracle.Stephen Sviatoslav Bilynskyj - 1983 - Dissertation, University of Notre Dame
Machining fantasy: Spinoza, Hume and the miracle in a politics of desire.Kyle McGee - 2010 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (7):837-856.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
9 (#1,224,450)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references