Peter Atterton and Matthew Calarco, eds., Animal Philosophy: Essential Readings in Continental Thought Reviewed by

Philosophy in Review 25 (4):235-237 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The editors cull the works of 11 noted French and German philosophers for their contributions to the debate about what animals are like and how we should relate to them. Each selection gives the gist of the philosopher's view followed by a noted scholar's comments. The result, as Peter Singer notes in his merciless Foreward, is that most of the Continentals have had almost nothing of interest to say on the topic.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethical cynicism.Peter Atterton - 2004 - In Matthew Calarco & Peter Atterton (eds.), Animal Philosophy: Essential Readings in Continental Thought. Continuum. pp. 51--61.
Radicalizing Levinas.Peter Atterton & Matthew Calarco (eds.) - 2010 - State University of New York Press.
Nietzsche and Animals.Alphonso Lingis - 2004 - In Matthew Calarco & Peter Atterton (eds.), Animal Philosophy: Essential Readings in Continental Thought. Continuum. pp. 7--14.
The Animal Question. [REVIEW]Matthew Calarco - 2004 - International Studies in Philosophy 36 (4):109-111.
Where to Cut: Boucherie and Delikatessen.John Llewelyn - 2010 - Research in Phenomenology 40 (2):161-187.
The Man Without Content. [REVIEW]Matthew R. Calarco - 2003 - International Studies in Philosophy 35 (1):128-129.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-14

Downloads
217 (#88,360)

6 months
44 (#86,430)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Margaret Van De Pitte
University of Alberta

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references