Questioning to resolve decision problems

Linguistics and Philosophy 26 (6):727-763 (2003)
Why do we ask questions? Because we want tohave some information. But why this particular kind ofinformation? Because only information of this particularkind is helpful to resolve the decision problemthat the agent faces. In this paper I argue thatquestions are asked because their answers help toresolve the questioner's decision problem, and that thisassumption helps us to interpret interrogativesentences. Interrogative sentences are claimed to have asemantically underspecified meaning and thisunderspecification is resolved by means of the decisionproblem.
Keywords Linguistics   Philosophy of Language   Artificial Intelligence   Computational Linguistics   Semantics   Syntax
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/B:LING.0000004548.98658.8f
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,678
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Decisions, Dynamics and the Japanese Particle Yo.C. Davis - 2009 - Journal of Semantics 26 (4):329-366.
Utility, Informativity and Protocols.Robert van Rooy - 2004 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (4):389-419.
A Modal Interpretation of the Logic of Interrogation.Rani Nelken & Chung-Chieh Shan - 2006 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 15 (3):251-271.
A Counterexample to the Contrastive Account of Knowledge.Jason Rourke - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (3):637-643.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
33 ( #179,238 of 2,236,870 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #266,081 of 2,236,870 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature