Righteous, Furious, or Arrogant? On Classifications of Warfare in Early Chinese Texts

In Peter Allan Lorge (ed.), Debating War in Chinese History. Brill Academic Publishers. pp. 13–40 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter studies classifications of warfare in Master Wu, The Four Canons, and Master Wen. In sections one through three, I analyze the classifications in their original contexts. How do they relate to the texts in which they appear? In what way does each classification feed into the overall philosophy of the text? In section four, I compare the three classifications. What are their similarities and differences? In section five, I discuss the possibility of a relationship between the three classifications. Are any perhaps directly and demonstrably influenced by another? I hypothesize that the classification of warfare in Master Wu may have served as a source for those in The Four Canons and Master Wen. In section six, I explore the development of classifications of warfare in writings from the Warring States period to the early Han dynasty. How did the classifications evolve from military–strategic writings to texts of politico–philosophical nature? Finally, in section seven, I survey the impact of classifications on the wider political debate on warfare in those days. Did classifications influence the debate? If so, to what effect?

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Philosophical approaches to classifications of sciences: biology.Olga E. Stoliarova - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (1):36-42.
Annotations.Edwin Lowe - 2010 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (3-4):259-259.
Systems of ordering data.Ernst Mayr - 1995 - Biology and Philosophy 10 (4):419-434.
Classifications.Ludger Jansen - 2008 - Applied Ontology: An Introduction.
On classifications and hierarchies.Rolf Schock - 1979 - Zeitschrift Für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 10 (1):98-106.
The Purposes of Biological Classification.Norman I. Platnick & Gareth Nelson - 1978 - PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978 (2):116-129.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-07-23

Downloads
213 (#105,729)

6 months
93 (#74,709)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul van Els
Leiden University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references