Zygon 49 (3):696-707 (2014)
AbstractRobert N. McCauley's new book Why Religion Is Natural and Science Is Not (2011) presents a new paradigm for investigating the relationship between science and religion by exploring the cognitive foundations of religious belief and scientific knowledge. McCauley's contention is that many of the differences and disagreements regarding religion and science are the product of distinct features of human cognition that process these two domains of knowledge very differently. McCauley's thesis provides valuable insights into this relationship while not necessarily leading to a dismissive view of theology or religious belief. His paradigm allows the research lens to focus on cognitive differences in processing scientific versus religious information and the important role of automatic, unconscious, and intuitive cognitive processes in understanding both the natural and supernatural worlds
Similar books and articles
Defining “Religion” as Natural: A Critical Invitation to Robert McCauley.Andrew Ali Aghapour - 2014 - Zygon 49 (3):708-715.
On McCauley's Why Religion is Natural and Science is Not: Some Further Observations.Gregory R. Peterson - 2014 - Zygon 49 (3):716-727.
How Science and Religion Are More Like Theology and Commonsense Explanations Than They Are Like Each Other: A Cognitive Account.Robert N. McCauley - unknown
Religious Experience, Cognitive Science, and the Future of Religion.Phillip H. Wiebe - 2006 - In Philip Clayton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 503-522.
The Cognitive Science of Religion/Atheism and its Impact on Plantinga's Reformed Epistemology.Richard Jonathan Sagar - unknown
Does Cognitive Science Show Belief in God to Be Irrational? The Epistemic Consequences of the Cognitive Science of Religion.Joshua C. Thurow - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (1):77-98.
The Cognitive Science of Religion: Philosophical Observations.Leo Näreaho - 2008 - Religious Studies 44 (1):83-98.
Reformed Epistemology and the Cognitive Science of Religion.Kelly James Clark - 2010 - In Faith and Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 500--513.
Reformed Epistemology and the Cognitive Science of Religion.Justin L. Barrett - 2010 - Faith and Philosophy 27 (2):174-189.
Cognitive Science and the Evolution of Religion.Nancey Murphy - 2009 - In Jeffrey Schloss & Michael J. Murray (eds.), The Believing Primate: Scientific, Philosophical, and Theological Reflections on the Origin of Religion. Oxford University Press. pp. 265.
Thinking About Religion: Examining Progress in Religious Cognition.Aaron C. T. Smith & Howard Sankey - 2013 - In Gregory W. Dawes & James Maclaurin (eds.), A New Science of Religion. Routledge.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again.Andy Clark - 1981 - MIT Press.
Studies in the Logic of Explanation.Carl Gustav Hempel & Paul Oppenheim - 1948 - Philosophy of Science 15 (2):135-175.
Review of Jonathan Haidt: The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion.Dale E. Miller - unknown