Acta Biotheoretica 51 (2):101-140 (2003)
Abstract |
Living organisms are currently most often seen as complex dynamical systems that develop and evolve in relation to complex environments. Reflections on the meaning of the complex dynamical nature of living systems show an overwhelming multiplicity in approaches, descriptions, definitions and methodologies. Instead of sustaining an epistemic pluralism, which often functions as a philosophical armistice in which tolerance and so-called neutrality discharge proponents of the burden to clarify the sources and conditions of agreement and disagreement, this paper aims at analysing: (i) what has been Kant's original conceptualisation of living organisms as natural purposes; (ii) how the current perspectives are to be related to Kant's viewpoint; (iii) what are the main trends in current complexity thinking. One of the basic ideas is that the attention for structure and its epistemological consequences witness to a great extent of Kant's viewpoint, and that the idea of organisational stratification today constitutes a different breeding ground within which complexity issues are raised. The various approaches of complexity in biological systems are captured in terms of two different styles, universalism and (weak and strong) constructivism, between which hybrid forms exist.
|
Keywords | Philosophy Philosophy of Biology Evolutionary Biology |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Reprint years | 2004 |
DOI | 10.1023/A:1024591510688 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Complexity Science: A "Gray" Science for the "Stuff in Between".Kurt A. Richardson, Paul Cilliers & Michael Lissack - 2001 - Emergence: Complexity and Organization 3 (2):6-18.
Supervenience and Reduction in Biological Hierarchies.John Collier - 1988 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 14:209.
Citations of this work BETA
Again, What the Philosophy of Biology is Not.Werner Callebaut - 2005 - Acta Biotheoretica 53 (2):93-122.
Metaphysical Presuppositions and Scientific Practices: Reductionism and Organicism in Cancer Research.James A. Marcum - 2005 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (1):31 – 45.
Kant and Naturalism Reconsidered.John H. Zammito - 2008 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 51 (5):532 – 558.
View all 10 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Philosophy of Biology: Outline of a Transcendental Project.Gertrudis Van de Vijver, Linda Van Speybroeck, Dani De Waele, Filip Kolen & Helena De Preester - 2005 - Acta Biotheoretica 53 (2):57-75.
Comments on Complexity and Experimentation in Biology.Richard M. Burian - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):291.
Ins and Outs of Systems Biology Vis-À-Vis Molecular Biology: Continuation or Clear Cut?Philippe De Backer, Danny De Waele & Linda Van Speybroeck - 2010 - Acta Biotheoretica 58 (1):15-49.
Life After Kant: Natural Purposes and the Autopoietic Foundations of Biological Individuality. [REVIEW]Andreas Weber & Francisco J. Varela - 2002 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1 (2):97-125.
How Can We Think the Complex?Carlos Gershenson & Francis Heylighen - 2004 - In [Book Chapter] (Unpublished).
The Compatibility of Complex Systems and Reduction: A Case Analysis of Memory Research. [REVIEW]William Bechtel - 2001 - Minds and Machines 11 (4):483-502.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
36 ( #318,116 of 2,519,267 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,861 of 2,519,267 )
2009-01-28
Total views
36 ( #318,116 of 2,519,267 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,861 of 2,519,267 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads