Canadian Bar Review 84 (1):89-105 (2005)

Authors
Lucinda Ann Vandervort Brettler
University of Saskatchewan
Abstract
Despite amendments to the sexual assault provisions in the Criminal Code, decisions about the availability and operation of the defence of belief in consent remain vulnerable to the influence of legally extraneous considerations. The author proposes an approach designed to limit the influence of such considerations
Keywords defence of belief in consent  sexual assault  criminal law  Canada  mens rea  excuse  mistake of law  stereotype  rape culture  common sense
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Harming Consent.P. Markwick - 2002 - Res Publica 8 (2):157-162.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
187 ( #47,462 of 2,348,325 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #43,136 of 2,348,325 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes