Abstract
In this paper, it is argued that the question ldquo;What is life?rdquo; time and again emergesmdash;and within the confines of an objectivistic/subjectivistic frame of thought has to emergemdash;as a symptom, a non-deciphered, cryptic message that insists on being interpreted. br /Our hypothesis is that the failure to measure up the living to the standards of objectification has been taken too frequently from an objectivistic angle, leading to a simple postponement of an objective treatment of the living, and meanwhile confining it to the domain of the subjective, the relative and the metaphorical. As a consequence, the truly important question of the co-constitutive relation between objectivity and subjectivity is thereby evaded. A critical, transcendental account can be relevant in this regard, not only because of the fact that objectivity and subjectivity are seen as co-constitutive, but also because it addresses the question of the embeddedness of objectivity and subjectivity from within the living dynamics.br /This hypothesis will be articulated on the basis of Erwin Schrouml;dingerrsquo;s famous little book on ldquo;What is life?rdquo;, in dialogue with Robert Rosenrsquo;s critical reading of it. It appears that Schrouml;dinger considered the living as a genuine challenge for classical objectification procedures. However, it is doubtful whether this brought him to a critical reading of objectivity or to the acknowledgment of a constitutive role of subjectivity in relation to objectivity. We argue that his viewpoint has the merit ofnbsp; expressing the difficulty of the living within the field of the physical sciences, but does not really transcend the objectivism/subjectivism opposition. At this point, Rosenrsquo;s relational account takes up the challenge more radically by acknowledging the need for a new epistemology and a new metaphysics in relation to living systems, and by attributing a place to classical objectivity from within this ldquo;new sciencerdquo;. In conclusion, we return to Kantrsquo;s epistemological proposal, and show its potential relevance in this debate.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 61,025
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Critique of Judgment.Immanuel Kant - 1790 - Barnes & Noble.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Objectivity in Logic and Nature.Richard Dien Winfield - 2002 - The Owl of Minerva 34 (1):77-89.
BEYOND MODES OF OBJECTIVITY.Robert Albin - 2012 - Logos and Episteme (3):361-371.
Subjectivity and Objectivity in Biblical Exegesis.J. G. Davies - 1983 - John Rylands University Library of Manchester.
Towards a Lacanian Group Psychology: The Prisoner's Dilemma and the Trans‐Subjective.Derek Hook - 2013 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 43 (2):115-132.
On Objectivity.Felix Mühlhölzer - 1988 - Erkenntnis 28 (2):185 - 230.
On Objectivity.Felix M.�Hlh�Lzer - 1988 - Erkenntnis 28 (2):185-230.
Objectivity and Subjectivity Revisited: Colour as a Psychobiological Property.Gary Hatfield - 2003 - In Rainer Mausfeld & Dieter Heyer (eds.), Colour Perception: Mind and the Physical World. Oxford University Press. pp. 187--202.
Husserl's Transcendental Subjectivity.Max Deutscher - 1980 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10 (1):21 - 45.
Objectivity.Lorraine Daston - 2007 - The MIT Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-08-24

Total views
2 ( #1,392,200 of 2,439,580 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #282,563 of 2,439,580 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes