‘Sed ea quae obscura sunt praetermitto’

Augustinianum 57 (2):493-513 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although at first sight the Speculum contains ‘too little Augustine’ for theologians who are attempting to discover the originality of this thought, it is in fact a revealing anthology. An examination of the criteria used for the selection of Scriptural quotations brings to light an important facet of his mystagogy. Both the exclusion and inclusion criteria demonstrate that Augustine’s intention is to confront his reader with his own imperfections, and this to a much greater degree than is suggested by the understatement of Speculum 108 that the moral guidelines proffered should have an immediate impact. Augustine’s aim in writing the Speculum is to effect a confrontation of the reader with himself, in a first, but permanent step on the way of mystagogy. Scripture serves as a mirror to reflect as detailed and unpolished an image as possible of the person who looks into it; the confrontation must be as violent as possible.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A 'Locvs Desperatvs' in Quintilian.F. H. Colson - 1923 - Classical Quarterly 17 (3-4):187-.
A ‘locvs Desperatvs’ In Quintilian.F. H. Colson - 1923 - Classical Quarterly 17 (3-4):187-190.
«Id est summum omnium quae sunt».Paul Gilbert - 1984 - Revue Philosophique De Louvain 82 (54):199-223.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-01-21

Downloads
13 (#1,013,785)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references