Faith and Philosophy 18 (2):241-260 (2001)
In this paper I discuss William Lane Craig’s response to problems faced by Molinists who hold that an eternal hell exists and that most people who fail to accept Christ during their earthly lives end up there. Craig suggests that it is plausible to suppose that most people who fail to accept Christ suffer from transworld damnation, and that the fact that they do ensures that it is fair that they end up in hell regardless of whether they hear the Gospel message. I argue that whether this suggestion-which I call ‘Craig’s contentious suggestion’-is true depends on how transworld damnation is understood. I present four interpretations of transworld damnation, and argue that on three of the interpretations Craig’s suggestion is clearly unacceptable, but that it may be acceptable on the fourth
|Keywords||Contemporary Philosophy Philosophy and Religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Might-Counterfactuals, Transworld Untrustworthiness and Plantinga's Free Will Defence.Michael Bergmann - 1999 - Faith and Philosophy 16 (3):336-351.
Why God Lied to Me: Salvationist Theism and Justice.Lee Basham - 2002 - Journal of Religious Ethics 30 (2):231 - 249.
Craig on the Possibility of Eternal Damnation.Thomas Talbott - 1992 - Religious Studies 28 (4):495 - 510.
Divine Foreknowledge and Eternal Damnation: The Theory of Middle Knowledge as Solution to the Soteriological Problem of Evil.Rik Peels - 2006 - Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 48 (2):160-75.
Is “Craig's Contentious Suggestion” Really so Implausible?William Lane Craig - 2005 - Faith and Philosophy 22 (3):358-362.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #166,409 of 2,172,090 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #56,430 of 2,172,090 )
How can I increase my downloads?