The disguised abusive ad hominem empirically investigated: Strategic manoeuvring with direct personal attacks

Thinking and Reasoning 18 (3):344 - 364 (2012)

Abstract
The main finding of a comprehensive empirical research project on the intersubjective acceptability of the pragma-dialectical discussion rules (Van Eemeren, Garssen & Meuffels, 2009) is that ordinary language users judge discussion moves that are considered fallacious from an argumentation-theoretical perspective as unreasonable. In light of this finding it is remarkable that in everyday argumentative discourse fallacies occur regularly and seem many times not to be noticed by the participants in the discourse. This also goes for the abusive argumentum ad hominem. While abusive ad hominem attacks are judged to be very unreasonable discussion moves when the unreasonableness of clear cases of this fallacy is rated in experiments, in real life this fallacy remains undetected more often than not. In this paper it is argued that this paradox can be explained by analysing abusive ad hominem attacks as a mode of strategic manoeuvring which takes on a reasonable appearance in real life situations when it mimics, as it often does, legitimate critical reactions to authority argumentation. The hypothesis that abusive fallacies are seen as less unreasonable when they are presented as if they are critical questions pertaining to the argument scheme for authority argumentation than when they are clear cases was tested systematically in two experiments. The results of these experiments confirmed the hypothesis
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/13546783.2012.678666
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,711
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Fallacies.C. L. Hamblin - 1970 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 160:492-492.
Introduction to Logic.Alfons Borgers & Irving M. Copi - 1961 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1):166.
Logic.Wesley C. Salmon - 1964 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 29 (2):89-90.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Ad Hominem Fallacies, Bias, and Testimony.Audrey Yap - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (2):97-109.
In Context.Frans van Eemeren - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (2):141-161.
Strategies of Character Attack.Fabrizio Macagno - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (4):1-33.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-06-13

Total views
44 ( #169,558 of 2,328,131 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #278,029 of 2,328,131 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature