Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):615-28 (1998)
Abstract |
According to the dominant computational approach in cognitive science, cognitive agents are digital computers; according to the alternative approach, they are dynamical systems. This target article attempts to articulate and support the dynamical hypothesis. The dynamical hypothesis has two major components: the nature hypothesis (cognitive agents are dynamical systems) and the knowledge hypothesis (cognitive agents can be understood dynamically). A wide range of objections to this hypothesis can be rebutted. The conclusion is that cognitive systems may well be dynamical systems, and only sustained empirical research in cognitive science will determine the extent to which that is true.
|
Keywords | cognition computability computational systems computers dynamical systems modeling systems time |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1017/s0140525x98001733 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory.David J. Chalmers - 1996 - Oxford University Press.
Phenomenology of Perception.Maurice Merleau-Ponty - 1962 - Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey: The Humanities Press.
View all 132 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
The Explanatory Force of Dynamical and Mathematical Models in Neuroscience: A Mechanistic Perspective.David Michael Kaplan & Carl F. Craver - 2011 - Philosophy of Science 78 (4):601-627.
Darwin's Mistake: Explaining the Discontinuity Between Human and Nonhuman Minds.Derek C. Penn, Keith J. Holyoak & Daniel J. Povinelli - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (2):109-130.
Neural Computation and the Computational Theory of Cognition.Gualtiero Piccinini & Sonya Bahar - 2013 - Cognitive Science 37 (3):453-488.
Extended Cognition & the Causal‐Constitutive Fallacy: In Search for a Diachronic and Dynamical Conception of Constitution.Michael David Kirchhoff - 2015 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90 (2):320-360.
View all 181 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Computers and Computation in Cognitive Science.Tim van Gelder - 1998 - In T.M. Michalewicz (ed.), Advances in Computational Life Sciences Vol.2: Humans to Proteins. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing.
What is the Dynamical Hypothesis?Nick Chater & Ulrike Hahn - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):633-634.
Resisting the Tyranny of Terminology: The General Dynamical Hypothesis in Cognitive Science.Terence Horgan & John Tienson - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):643-643.
What Might Dynamical Intentionality Be, If Not Computation?Ronald L. Chrisley - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):634-635.
Is the Dynamical Hypothesis Falsifiable? On Unification in Theories of Cognition.David C. Noelle - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):647-648.
The Dynamical Hypothesis: One Battle Behind.Robert M. French & Elizabeth Thomas - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):640-641.
Why the Dynamical Hypothesis Cannot Qualify as a Law of Qualitative Structure.Nick Braisby, Richard Cooper & Bradley Franks - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):630-631.
Disentangling Dynamics, Computation, and Cognition.Tim van Gelder - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):654-661.
Digital Computers Versus Dynamical Systems: A Conflation of Distinctions.Gerard O'Brien - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):648-649.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
405 ( #24,370 of 2,505,142 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #74,004 of 2,505,142 )
2009-01-28
Total views
405 ( #24,370 of 2,505,142 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #74,004 of 2,505,142 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads