The ethics of interpretation: from charity as a principle to love as a hermeneutic imperative

New York, NY: Routledge (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This book discusses the ethical dimension of the interpretation of texts and events. Its purpose is not to address the neutrality or ideological biases of interpreters, but rather to discuss the underlying issue of the intervention of interpreters into the process of interpretation. The author calls this intervention the "ethical" aspect of interpretation and argues that interpreters are neither neutral nor necessarily activists. He examines three models of interpretation, all of which recognize the role that interpreters play in the process of interpretation. In these models, the question of the truth or validity of interpretation is dependent upon the attitude of interpreters. These three models are: (1) the principle of charity in interpretation in the two different versions defended by Hans-Georg Gadamer and Donald Davidson; (2) the production of truth, as developed by Paul Ricoeur and Michel Foucault; and (3) the regulative principle in interpretation as formal validity claims-as presented by Karl-Otto Apel and Jürgen Habermas-and as benevolence or love as an epistemic virtue-as defended by Friedrich Schlegel and Friedrich Schleiermacher. The critical discussion of these three models, which brings to the fore the different manners in which interpreters intervene in the process of interpretation as persons, lays the foundations for an ethics of interpretation. The Ethics of Interpretation will be of interest to scholars and advanced students working in hermeneutics, 19th- and 20th-century philosophy, literary theory, and cultural theory.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The limit of charity and agreement.Chuang Ye - 2008 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (1):99-122.
The nature of interpretative charity.Jeff Malpas - 1988 - Dialectica 42 (1):17-36.
The limit of charity and agreement.Y. E. Chuang - 2008 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (1):99-122.
The Nature of Interpretative Charity.J. E. Malpas - 1988 - Dialectica 42 (1):17-36.
The Paradox of Charity.Marcin Lewiński - 2012 - Informal Logic 32 (4):403-439.
Charity Implies Meta‐Charity.Roy Sorensen - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (2):290-315.
The Method of Question and Answer as a Principle of Charity in Gadamer's Hermeneutics.David Vessey - 2008 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 2 (203):1-14.
Charity, Self-Interpretation, and Belief.Henry Jackman - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Research 28:143-168.
Radical Interpretation and the Principle of Charity.Peter Pagin - 2013 - In Ernie Lepore & Kurt Ludwig (eds.), Blackwell Companion to Donald Davidson. Blackwell. pp. 225-246.
Charity, Supervenience, and Skepticism.Hamid Vahid - 2001 - Metaphilosophy 32 (3):308-325.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-19

Downloads
8 (#1,287,956)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pol Vandevelde
Marquette University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references