Authors
Ariane Bazan
Université Libre de Bruxelles
Abstract
In Logique du Fantasme, Lacan argues that the compulsion to repeat does not obey the same discharge logic as homeostatic processes. Repetition installs a realm that is categorically different from the one related to homeostatic pleasure seeking, a properly subjective one, one in which the mark “stands for,” “takes the place of,” what we have ventured to call “an event,” and what only in the movement of return, in what Lacan calls a “thinking of repetition,” confirms and ever reconfirms this point of no return, which is also a qualitative cut and a structural loss. The kind of “standing for” Lacan intends here with the concept of repetition is certainly not something like an image or a faithful description. No, what Lacan wishes to stress is that this mark is situated at another level, at another place, it is “entstellt,” and as such, it is punctually impinging upon the bodily dynamics without rendering the event, without having an external meta-point of view, but cutting across registers according to a logics that is not the homeostatic memory logics. This paper elaborates on this distinction on the basis of a confrontation with what Freud says about the pleasure principle and its beyond in Beyond the Pleasure Principle, and also takes inspiration from Freud’s Project for a Scientific Psychology. We argue that Lacan’s theory of enjoyment takes up and generalizes what Freud was after in Beyond the Pleasure Principle with the Wiederholungszwang, and pushes Freud’s thoughts to a more articulated point: to the point where a subject is considered to speak only when it has allowed the other, through discourse, to have impacted and cut into his bodily pleasure dynamics.
Keywords Freud  Lacan  repetition  compulsion  jouissance  fort-da  beyond the pleasure principle  representation  dopamine
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02244
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

On Denoting.Bertrand Russell - 1905 - Mind 14 (56):479-493.
The Interpretation of Dreams.Sigmund Freud & A. A. Brill - 1900 - Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 10 (20):551-555.
'Superstition' in the Pigeon.B. F. Skinner - 1948 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 38 (2):168.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

That Obscure Object of Psychoanalysis.Dany Nobus - 2013 - Continental Philosophy Review 46 (2):163-187.
You Never Know Your Luck: Lacan Reads Pascal. [REVIEW]Dominiek Hoens - 2013 - Continental Philosophy Review 46 (2):241-249.
Objeto tr(a)nsicional: Uma releitura lacaniana.Suely Aires - 2008 - Philósophos - Revista de Filosofia 13 (2):99-116.
Ensaio Sobre a Sublimação.Tania Rivera - 2007 - Discurso 36:313-326.
Resistance and Repetition: Freud and Hegel.Rebecca Comay - 2015 - Research in Phenomenology 45 (2):237-266.
Meontological Generativity: A Daoist Reading of the Thing.David Chai - 2014 - Philosophy East and West 64 (2):303-318.
The Title of the Letter: A Reading of Lacan.François Raffoul & David Pettigrew (eds.) - 1992 - State University of New York Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-12-22

Total views
117 ( #101,240 of 2,518,724 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #88,418 of 2,518,724 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes