The Prejudicial Effects of 'Reasonable Steps' in Analysis of Mens Rea and Sexual Consent: Two Solutions

Alberta Law Review 55 (4):933-970 (2018)
Lucinda Ann Vandervort Brettler
University of Saskatchewan
This article examines the operation of “reasonable steps” as a statutory standard for analysis of the availability of the defence of belief in consent in sexual assault cases and concludes that application of section 273.2(b) of the Criminal Code, as presently worded, often undermines the legal validity and correctness of decisions about whether the accused acted with mens rea, a guilty, blameworthy state of mind. When the conduct of an accused who is alleged to have made a mistake about whether a complainant communicated consent is assessed by the hybrid subjective-objective reasonableness standard prescribed by s. 273.2, many decision-makers rely on extra-legal criteria and assumptions grounded on their personal experience and opinion about what is reasonable. In the midst of debate over what the accused knew and what steps were “reasonable” given what the accused knew, the legal definition of consent in section 273.1 is easily over-looked and decision-makers focus on facts that are legally irrelevant and prejudice rational deliberation. That is precisely what we see here; the result is often failure to enforce the law. The author proposes: (a) that section 273.2 be amended to reflect the significant developments achieved in sexual consent jurisprudence since enactment of the provision in 1992; and (b) that, in the interim, the judiciary act with resolve to make full and proper use of the statutory and common law tools that are presently available to determine whether the accused acted with mens rea in relation to the absence of sexual consent.
Keywords sexual assault  affirmative consent  mens rea  reasonable steps  judicial decision-making  common sense  prejudicial effect  mistake of fact  belief  knowledge
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Mistake of Law and Sexual Assault: Consent and Mens Rea.Lucinda Vandervort - 1987-1988 - Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 2 (2):233-309.
Enforcing the Sexual Laws: An Agenda for Action.Lucinda Vandervort - 1985 - Resources for Feminist Research 3 (4):44-45.
Sexual Activity, Consent, Mistaken Belief, and Mens Rea.Peg Tittle - 1996 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 3 (1):19-22.
Sexual Assault and the Mens Rea Problem: The Empathic Approach.Kristie Hirschenberger - 1999 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Juliette: A Model of Sexual Consent.Kavanagh Chandra - 2016 - Journal of the International Network for Sexual Ethics and Politics 4 (1):43-54.
Consent and Sexual Relations.Alan Wertheimer - 1996 - Legal Theory 2 (2):89-112.


Added to PP index

Total views
17 ( #369,004 of 2,309,257 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #35,617 of 2,309,257 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature