The problem with(out) consensus : the scientific consensus, deliberative democracy and agonistic pluralism

In The Social Sciences and Democracy. Palgrave-Macmillan (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Consensus and power in deliberative democracy.Tim6 Heysse - 2006 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 49 (3):265 – 289.
Agonistic Critiques of Liberalism: Perfection and Emancipation.Thomas Fossen - 2008 - Contemporary Political Theory 7 (4):376–394.
Agonism in divided societies.Andrew Schaap - 2006 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (2):255-277.
Ethics by committee: The moral authority of consensus.Jonathan D. Moreno - 1988 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (4):411-432.
Hierarchy of scientific consensus and the flow of dissensus over time.Kyung-Man Kim - 1996 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 26 (1):3-25.
Philosophy, politics, democracy: selected essays.Joshua Cohen - 2009 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-20

Downloads
137 (#135,997)

6 months
1 (#1,478,456)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeroen Van Bouwel
Ghent University

Citations of this work

The Unity of Science.Jordi Cat - 2013 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Scientific Pluralism.Ludwig David & Ruphy Stéphanie - 2021 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Scientific Progress and Democratic Society through the Lens of Scientific Pluralism.Theptawee Chokvasin - 2023 - Suranaree Journal of Social Science 17 (2):Article ID e268392 (pp. 1-15).

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references