The Role of Argument in Negotiation

Argumentation 32 (4):549-567 (2018)

Authors
Jan Albert Van Laar
University of Groningen
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to show the pervasive, though often implicit, role of arguments in negotiation dialogue. This holds even for negotiations that start from a difference of interest such as mere bargaining through offers and counteroffers. But it certainly holds for negotiations that try to settle a difference of opinion on policy issues. It will be demonstrated how a series of offers and counteroffers in a negotiation dialogue contains a reconstructible series of implicit persuasion dialogues. The paper is a sequel to van Laar and Krabbe, in which we showed that for some differences of opinion it may be reasonable to shift from persuasion dialogue, aimed at a resolution of the difference on the merits, to negotiation dialogue, aimed at compromise, whereas in the present paper we show that such a shift need not amount to the abandonment of argumentation. Our main aim in this paper as well as in the previous one is to contribute to the theory of argumentation within the context of negotiation and compromise formation.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10503-018-9458-x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 42,172
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Criticism and Justification of Negotiated Compromises.Jan Albert van Laar & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2019 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 8 (1):91-111.
On the Possibility of Principled Moral Compromise.Daniel Weinstock - 2013 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (4):537-556.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Persuasion Dialogue in Online Dispute Resolution.Douglas Walton & David M. Godden - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (2):273-295.
Negotiation, Persuasion and Argument.Chris Provis - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (1):95-112.
Negotiation and Defeasible Decision Making.Fernando Tohmé - 2002 - Theory and Decision 53 (4):289-311.
Challenges of Deliberation and Participation.Forester John - 2006 - Les Ateliers de L’Ethique 1 (2):20-25.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-04-24

Total views
12 ( #629,839 of 2,253,661 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #484,691 of 2,253,661 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature