Understanding in political science: The plurality of epistemic interests.

In Henk De Regt, Sabina Leonelli & Kai Eigner (eds.), Scientific Understanding: Philosophical Perspectives. University of Pittsburgh Press (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The dual character of Marxian social science.Donald Clark Hodges - 1962 - Philosophy of Science 29 (4):333-349.
Indispensability arguments in favour of reductive explanations.Jeroen Van Bouwel, Erik Weber & Leen De Vreese - 2011 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 42 (1):33-46.
The omniscienter: Beauty and scientific understanding.Peter Kosso - 2002 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16 (1):39 – 48.
Political theory: methods and approaches.David Leopold & Marc Stears (eds.) - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Private interests count too.Mark S. Frankel - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):367-373.
The epistemic value of understanding.Henk W. de Regt - 2009 - Philosophy of Science 76 (5):585-597.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-12-16

Downloads
16 (#830,801)

6 months
1 (#1,346,405)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeroen Van Bouwel
Ghent University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references