Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (2):235-256 (2005)
This paper starts from the presupposition that moral codes often do not suffice to make agents understand their moral responsibility. We will illustrate this statement with a concrete example of engineers who design a truck’s trailer and who do not think traffic safety is part of their responsibility. This opinion clashes with a common supposition that designers in fact should do all that is in their power to ensure safety in traffic. In our opinion this shows the need for a moral philosophy that helps engineers to interpret their responsibility and think more critically about it. For this purpose we will explore the moral philosophy of Alasdair MacIntyre, which is particularly interesting because he locates the beginning of moral thinking in the daily practice of a profession. This is consistent with the history of moral codes, for codes are also the product of moral reflection by professionals. We will use MacIntyre’s philosophy to (1) explain what is wrong with the designers’ understanding of their responsibility and (2) show a possible way to bring their reflection to a more self-critical level. We will also inspect MacIntyre’s proposal critically.
|Keywords||engineering design safety practices MacIntyre moral responsibility|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Dependent Rational Animals-Why Human Beings Need the Virtues.Alasdair Macintyre - 1999 - Mind 110 (437):225-229.
Thinking Like an Engineer: Studies in the Ethics of a Profession.Michael Davis - 1998 - Oxford University Press.
Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry: Encyclopaedia, Genealogy, and Tradition.Alasdair Macintyre - 1990 - Inquiry 34:255.
Citations of this work BETA
Emotional Engineers: Toward Morally Responsible Design. [REVIEW]Sabine Roeser - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):103-115.
The Responsibilities of Engineers.Justin Smith, Paolo Gardoni & Colleen Murphy - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (2):519-538.
Ethicist as Designer: A Pragmatic Approach to Ethics in the Lab.Aimee van Wynsberghe & Scott Robbins - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (4):947-961.
Similar books and articles
Recent Work on Free Will and Moral Responsibility.Neil Levy & Michael McKenna - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (1):96-133.
Moral Responsibility and the Boundaries of Community.Marion Smiley - 1992 - University of Chicago Press.
Moral Responsibility, Authenticity, and Education.Ishtiyaque Haji - 2008 - Routledge.
Moral Responsibility and History Revisited.Alfred R. Mele - 2009 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (5):463 - 475.
Free Will and Moral Responsibility.John Martin Fischer - 2004 - In D. Copps (ed.), Handbook on Ethical Theory. Oxford University Press.
The Application of Ethics to Engineering and the Engineer's Moral Responsibility: Perspectives for a Research Agenda.Armin Grunwald - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (3):415-428.
Moral Responsibility—What is All the Fuss About?Kenton Machina - 2007 - Acta Analytica 22 (1):29-47.
Understanding Moral Responsibility in the Design of Trailers.Simone Burg & Anke Gorp - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (2):235-256.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #185,235 of 2,153,328 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #281,037 of 2,153,328 )
How can I increase my downloads?