What Is “NIPT”? Divergent Characterizations of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing Strategies

Ajob Empirical Bioethics 6 (1):54-67 (2015)

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/23294515.2014.993102
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,330
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Foucault and the Government of Disability.Shelley Tremain (ed.) - 2005 - University of Michigan Press.
A Disability Critique of the New Prenatal Test for Down Syndrome.Chris Kaposy - 2013 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 23 (4):299-324.
A New Era in Prenatal Testing: Are We Prepared? [REVIEW]Dagmar Schmitz - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (3):357-364.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Prenatal Testing for Selection Against Disabilities.Mary B. Mahowald - 2007 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (4):457.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-03-20

Total views
29 ( #324,498 of 2,291,029 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #833,703 of 2,291,029 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature