Public Health Ethics 5 (2):154-160 (2012)
Vaccination programmes against infectious diseases aim to protect individuals from serious illness but also offer collective protection once a sufficient number of people have been immunized. This so-called ‘herd immunity’ is important for individuals who, for health reasons, cannot be immunized or who respond less well to vaccines. For these individuals, it is pivotal that others establish group protection. However, herd immunity can be compromised when people deliberately decide not to be immunized and benefit from the herd’s protection. These agents are often referred to as free riders: their omissions are deemed to be unfair to those who do contribute to the collective’s health. This article addresses the unfairness of such ‘free riding’. An argument by Garett Cullity is examined, which asserts that the unfairness of moral free riding lies neither in one’s intentions, nor in one’s reluctance to embrace a public good. This argument offers a strong basis for justifiably arguing that free riding is unfair. However, it is then argued that other considerations also need to be taken into account before simply holding free riding against non-compliers
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Paper Four: Non-Compliance: Fair or Free-Riding. [REVIEW]Paul T. Menzel - 1995 - Health Care Analysis 3 (2):113-115.
Informing Education Policy on MMR: Balancing Individual Freedoms and Collective Responsibilities for the Promotion of Public Health.Janice Wood-Harper - 2005 - Nursing Ethics 12 (1):43-58.
Citations of this work BETA
Health Promotion: Conceptual and Ethical Issues.A. Dawson & K. Grill - 2012 - Public Health Ethics 5 (2):101-103.
Similar books and articles
Public Goods and Fairness.Garrett Cullity - 2008 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (1):1 – 21.
On the Structural Aspects of Collective Action and Free-Riding.Raimo Tuomela - 1992 - Theory and Decision 32 (2):165-202.
Vaccination Policy and Ethical Challenges Posed by Herd Immunity, Suboptimal Uptake and Subgroup Targeting.J. Luyten, A. Vandevelde, P. Van Damme & P. Beutels - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (3):280-291.
The Other Cooperation Problem: Generating Benefit.Brett Calcott - 2008 - Biology and Philosophy 23 (2):179-203.
We-Intentions, Free-Riding, and Being in Reserve.Raimo Tuomela & Kaarlo Miller - 1992 - Erkenntnis 36 (1):25 - 52.
Sharing-Rule and Detection of Free-Riders in Cooperative Groups: Evolutionarily Important Deontic Reasoning in the Wason Selection Task.Kai Hiraishi & Toshikazu Hasegawa - 2001 - Thinking and Reasoning 7 (3):255 – 294.
Free Will.Saul Smilansky - 1999 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1999:143-152.
Free Will: The Positive Role of Illusion.Saul Smilansky - 1999 - In The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy. Bowling Green: Philosophy Doc Ctr. pp. 143-152.
Towards a Normative Framework for Public Health Ethics and Policy.James Wilson - 2009 - Public Health Ethics 2 (2):184-194.
Book ReviewsRichard Tuck,. Free Riding.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008. Pp. 223. $35.00. [REVIEW]S. M. Amadae - 2008 - Ethics 119 (1):211-216.
Expert Testimony and Epistemological Free-Riding: The Mmr Controversy.Stephen John - 2011 - Philosophical Quarterly 61 (244):496-517.
Added to index2012-09-22
Total downloads60 ( #87,859 of 2,172,866 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #46,231 of 2,172,866 )
How can I increase my downloads?