Wim Vanrie
University of Ghent
I defend an account of Moore’s conception of Common Sense – as it figures in 'A Defence of Common Sense' – according to which it is based in a vision of the community of human beings as bound and unified by a settled common understanding of the meaning of our words and statements. This, for Moore, is our inalienable starting point in philosophy. When Moore invokes Common Sense against idealist (and skeptical) philosophers, he is reminding them that they too are bound by this common understanding, which cannot just be left behind or overcome, as they confusedly believe. On Moore’s conception, Common Sense becomes nothing other than the affirmation that there is Common Sense, i.e. that there is such a common understanding. This yields a principled account of Common Sense as common knowledge that moves beyond a mere tallying of what we all contingently happen to believe. Moore’s attempts to further characterize our common knowledge show him struggling to apply his internalist predilections to Common Sense. Although his final position is confused, it reveals two further important points. First, our having Common Sense knowledge is not, for Moore, an introspectable mental state. Second, the Common Sense truths, on Moore’s view, acquire a liminal status between being analytic and synthetic, conceptual and empirical.
Keywords G.E. Moore  Ludwig Wittgenstein  Common Sense
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What's Wrong with Moore's Argument?James Pryor - 2004 - Philosophical Issues 14 (1):349–378.
A Reply to My Critics.George Edward Moore - 1942 - In Paul Arthur Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of G. E. Moore. Open Court.
The Perils of Dogmatism.Crispin Wright - 2007 - In Nuccetelli & Seay (eds.), Themes from G. E. Moore: New Essays in Epistemology. Oxford University Press.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Moore and Wittgenstein on Common Sense.Renia Gasparatou - 2009 - Philosophical Inquiry 31 (3-4):65-75.
Philosophy of Common Sense. [REVIEW]C. R. L. - 1979 - Review of Metaphysics 32 (3):532-533.
Defending Common Sense: The Epistemology of G. E. Moore.Dianne Elise Romain - 1980 - Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
Common Sense.Michael De Medeiros - 2010 - Weigl Publishers.
The Epistemology of G. E. Moore. [REVIEW]J. E. J. - 1970 - Review of Metaphysics 23 (3):558-558.
Epistemologi Common Sense Abad XX.Abbas Hamami Mintaredja - 2007 - Jurnal Filsafat 13 (3):288-297.
Moore's Appeal to Common Sense.Alan R. White - 1958 - Philosophy 33 (126):221 - 239.
Moore's Arguments Against Epistemological Scepticism.Paul Salvatore Sita - 1982 - Dissertation, City University of New York
G. E. Moore and the Problem of Skepticism.Katheryn Hill Doran - 1984 - Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill


Added to PP index

Total views
102 ( #100,545 of 2,428,024 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #24,012 of 2,428,024 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes