Mind 112 (446):295–298 (2003)

Authors
Achille C. Varzi
Columbia University
Abstract
R. Sorensen’s argument to the effect that ’vague’ is a vague predicate has been used by D. Hyde to infer that vague predicates suffer from higher-order vagueness. M. Tye has objected (convincingly) that this is too strong: all that follows from Sorensen’s result is that there are some border border cases, but not necessarily border border cases of every vague predicate. I argue that this is still too strong: Sorensen’s proof presupposes the existence of border border cases, hence cannot be used to establish that fact on pain of circularity.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/mind/112.446.295
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,740
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Sense and Sensibilia.J. L. AUSTIN - 1962 - Oxford University Press.
Sense and Sensibilia.J. L. Austin - 1962 - Oxford University Press USA.
Sense and Sensibilia.[author unknown] - 1962 - Foundations of Language 3 (3):303-310.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

‘Vague’ at Higher Orders.Ivan Hu - 2017 - Mind 126 (504):1189-1216.
Betting on Borderline Cases.Richard Dietz - 2008 - Philosophical Perspectives 22 (1):47-88.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
133 ( #83,074 of 2,462,874 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #223,428 of 2,462,874 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes