Los tres grados de compromiso modal de Quine y el no-cognitivismo modal

Signos Filosóficos 12 (23):103-133 (2010)

Abstract
Resumen: En este artí­culo examino el tratamiento escéptico que Quine hace de la necesidad proposicional y no-proposicional a través de su teorí­a de tres grados de compromiso modal. Argumento que, a pesar de poseer diversos aspectos valiosos, sufre de varias limitaciones importantes que lo hacen insatisfactorio; en especí­fico, no puede ofrecer una base adecuada para una explicación no-eliminativista de la necesidad proposicional, dado el papel bastante marginal que le asigna a esta noción en nuestras vidas práctica y teórica, y no puede proporcionar una explicación de la necesidad a posteriori. En vista de esto, intento motivar una teorí­a no-cognitivista modal como, potencialmente, la mejor respuesta al tratamiento escéptico quineano, esto por dos razones: porque respeta importantes consideraciones y criterios quineanos, pero es capaz de remediar las limitaciones que aquejan a la explicación quineana de la necesidad.: In this paper I examine Quine"™s sceptical treatment of propositional and non-propositional necessity through his theory of three grades of modal involvement. I argue that, although it has various valuable features, it suffers from some serious limitations that make it unsatisfactory; specifically, it cannot offer a suitable basis for a non-eliminativist account of propositional necessity, given the very marginal role he assigns to this notion in our theoretical and practical lives, and it cannot provide an explanation of a posteriori necessity. In view of this I try to motivate a modal non-cognitivist account as, potentially, the best response to Quine"™s sceptical treatment, this for two reasons: because it respects important Quinean concerns and desiderata and it can remediate the limitations that affect Quine"™s account of necessity
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 52,661
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Quine on Modality.Dagfinn Føllesdal - 1968 - Synthese 19 (1-2):147 - 157.
Rethinking Quine’s Argument on the Collapse of Modal Distinctions.Genoveva Mart’I. - 1997 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38 (2):276-294.
Quine E O “pecado” Da Lógica Modal.Cleverson Bastos & Paulo de Oliveira - 2011 - Episteme NS: Revista Del Instituto de Filosofía de la Universidad Central de Venezuela 31 (1):1-17.
Three Grades of Probabilistic Involvement.Howard Smokler - 1977 - Philosophical Studies 32 (2):129 - 142.
Understanding and Essence.Anand Jayprakash Vaidya - 2010 - Philosophia 38 (4):811-833.
Hume's Absolute Necessity.Thomas Holden - 2014 - Mind 123 (490):377-413.
Modal Primitivism.Jennifer Wang - 2013 - Dissertation, Rutgers University
Anderson and Belnap’s Invitation to Sin.Alasdair Urquhart - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (4):453 - 472.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-01-31

Total views
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes