Erkenntnis 46 (1):87-110 (1997)

Abstract
Moralising is a venerable last resort strategy. The ancient Melians presented the Athenian generals with a splendid example when in a particularly tight corner. In our Western philosophical tradition moral rhetoric is often couched in the form of reasons for action either external to preference and desire (eg. Kant) or internal to the agent''s calculus of desire (e.g., Hume, Gauthier). A third tradition dismisses such rhetoric as the last recourse of the weak (e.g., Aristotle, Nietzsche) whereas a fourth calls for an examination of the social context (e.g., Socrates, Marx, Wittgenstein, Habermas). This paper reports on an experiment which throws some empirical light on these debates and offers a surprising twist to the interpretation of the Melians'' plea.
Keywords Philosophy   Philosophy   Epistemology   Ethics   Logic   Ontology
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1005335518281
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,634
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Morals by Agreement.David P. Gauthier - 1986 - Oxford University Press.
Critique of Practical Reason.Immanuel Kant - 1788 - Hackett Publishing Company.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
27 ( #427,846 of 2,533,767 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #388,784 of 2,533,767 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes