Law and Philosophy 28 (6):585 - 616 (2009)

Authors
Helga Varden
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Abstract
Central to Nozick’s Anarchy, State and Utopia is a defense of the legitimacy of the minimal state’s use of coercion against anarchist objections. Individuals acting within their natural rights can establish the state without committing wrongdoing against those who disagree. Nozick attempts to show that even with a natural executive right, individuals need not actually consent to incur political obligations. Nozick’s argument relies on an account of compensation to remedy the infringement of the non-consenters’ procedural rights. Compensation, however, cannot remedy the infringement, for either it is superfluous to Nozick’s account of procedural rights, or it is made to play a role inconsistent with Nozick’s liberal voluntarist commitments. Nevertheless, Nozick’s account of procedural rights contains clues for how to solve the problem. Since procedural rights are incompatible with a natural executive right, Nozickeans can argue that only the state can enforce individuals’ rights without wronging anyone, thus refuting the anarchist.
Keywords Philosophy   Political Science   Law Theory/Law Philosophy   Philosophy of Law
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10982-009-9046-1
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Indirect Instrumentalism About Political Legitimacy.Matthias Brinkmann - 2019 - Moral Philosophy and Politics 6 (1):175-202.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Squirrel and the State.Nicolas Maloberti - 2010 - The Independent Review 14 (3):377-387.
Whither Anarchy? Has Robert Nozick Justified the State?Randy Barnett - 1977 - Journal of Libertarian Studies 1 (1):15-21.
Robert Nozick and the Immaculate Conception of the State.Murray Rothbard - 1977 - Journal of Libertarian Studies 1 (1):45-57.
II. Nozick's Entitlements.Onora O'Neill - 1976 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 19 (1-4):468-481.
Has Nozick Justified the State?Charles Sayward & Wayne Wasserman - 1981 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 62 (4):411-415.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-04-20

Total views
261 ( #41,581 of 2,504,813 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #42,451 of 2,504,813 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes