A Metaphysical Reflection on the Notion of Background in Modern Spacetime Physics

In Laura Felline (ed.), New Developments in Logic and Philosophy of Science. pp. 349-365 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper presents a metaphysical characterization of spatiotemporal backgrounds from a realist perspective. The conceptual analysis is based on a heuristic sketch that encompasses the common formal traits of the major spacetime theories, such as Newtonian mechanics and general relativity. It is shown how this framework can be interpreted in a fully realist fashion, and what is the role of background structures in such a picture. In the end it is argued that, although backgrounds are a source of metaphysical discomfort, still they make a spacetime theory easy to interpret. It is also suggested that this conclusion partially explains why the notion of background independence carries a lot of conceptual difficulties.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Can Bohmian mechanics be made background independent?Antonio Vassallo - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 52 (Part B):242-250.
Background-independence.Gordon Belot - 2011 - General Relativity and Gravitation 43:2865-2884.
The singular nature of spacetime.Vincent Lam - 2007 - Philosophy of Science 74 (5):712-723.
Background Independence, Diffeomorphism Invariance, and the Meaning of Coordinates.Oliver Pooley - 2016 - In Dennis Lehmkuhl, Gregor Schiemann & Erhard Scholz (eds.), Towards a Theory of Spacetime Theories. New York, NY: Birkhauser.
Theories of Newtonian gravity and empirical indistinguishability.Jonathan Bain - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35 (3):345--76.
Spacetime theory as physical geometry.Robert Disalle - 1995 - Erkenntnis 42 (3):317-337.
Ruch, przestrzeń, czas.Jerzy Gołosz - 2002 - Filozofia Nauki 1:7 - 31.
Who's afraid of background independence?Dean Rickles - 2008 - In Dennis Dieks (ed.), The Ontology of Spacetime II. Elsevier. pp. 133--52.
Is Empty Spacetime a Physical Thing?Diego Meschini & Markku Lehto - 2006 - Foundations of Physics 36 (8):1193-1216.
The Medium for Motion: A Critical Clue to Understand Spacetime.Alfonso Leon Guillen Gomez - 2015 - International Journal of Modern Physics and Applications 1 (5):210-218.
Substantivalism, Relationism, and Structural Spacetime Realism.Mauro Dorato - 2000 - Foundations of Physics 30 (10):1605-1628.
A formal construction of the spacetime manifold.Thomas Benda - 2008 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 37 (5):441 - 478.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-20

Downloads
55 (#284,290)

6 months
7 (#411,886)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Antonio Vassallo
Warsaw University of Technology

Citations of this work

Dependence relations in general relativity.Antonio Vassallo - 2019 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 10 (1):1-28.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Symmetry as an Epistemic Notion.Shamik Dasgupta - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (3):837-878.
The “Structure” of Physics.Jill North - 2009 - Journal of Philosophy 106 (2):57-88.
Foundations of Space-Time Theories.Micheal Friedman - 1983 - Princeton University Press.

View all 15 references / Add more references