Synthese 100 (1):39 - 48 (1994)
The aim of this paper is to introduce a logically grounded approach to action semantics and action interpretation. The main idea is to present the context of action as a set of questions demanding an action to answer. I introduce (a) a basic procedure of action interpretation, which is a reformulation of Hilpinen's semantical procedure for imperatives; (b) a procedure of what-interpretation; (c) a procedure of why-interpretation. The conditions of mutual reducibility of interpretation procedures are explicated. The paper concludes by putting forth the problem of interpretive bounds of moral responsibility.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Collective Intentions and Actions.John Searle - 1990 - In Philip R. Cohen Jerry Morgan & Martha Pollack (eds.), Intentions in Communication. MIT Press. pp. 401-415.
The Intelligibility of Action.Alasdair MacIntyre - 1986 - In Joseph Margolis, Michael Krausz & Richard M. Burian (eds.), Rationality, Relativism, and the Human Sciences. M. Nijhoff. pp. 63--80.
Role and Rational Action.Margaret Urban Coyne - 1984 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 14 (3):259–275.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Can a Single Action Have Many Different Descriptions?Arthur B. Cody - 1967 - Inquiry 10 (1-4):164 – 180.
Moral Responsibility and Moral Development in Epicurus’ Philosophy.Susanne Bobzien - 2006 - In B. Reis & S. Haffmans (eds.), The Virtuous Life in Greek Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Reasons for Action.Pamela Hieronymi - 2011 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (3pt3):407-427.
Hume and the Debate on 'Motivating Reasons'.Constantine Sandis - 2009 - In Charles Pigden (ed.), Hume on Motivation and Virtue. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #208,408 of 2,158,205 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #65,193 of 2,158,205 )
How can I increase my downloads?