Abstract
Marx’s theory of historical materialism offers a scientific account of historical change. At the same time Marx and Engels seem to be making certain value-judgments and moral claims about sets of production relations and modes of production that appear to conflict with the theory’s value-free nature. And, it is my main objective to show that the theory as such does not “allow” for the reasonable making of value-judgments, which can damage the theory’s scientific and value-free character.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,617
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Historical Materialism and Supervenience.Colin Farrelly - 2005 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (4):420-446.
Is It Immaterial That There's a 'Material' in 'Historical Materialism'?Charles W. Mills - 1989 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 32 (3):323 – 342.
Das Geschichtliche in Marxistischer Sicht.Assen Ignatow - 1984 - Studies in East European Thought 27 (2):147-173.
Two Qualms About Functionalist Marxism.Joel Dickman - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (4):631-643.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-03-26

Total views
8 ( #917,864 of 2,348,907 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #512,628 of 2,348,907 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes