Shapelessness in Context

Noûs 48 (3):573-593 (2014)
Many philosophers believe that the extensions of evaluative terms and concepts aren’t unified under non-evaluative similarity relations and that this “shapelessness thesis” (ST) has significant metaethical implications regarding non-cognitivism, ethical naturalism, moral particularism, thick concepts and more. ST is typically offered as an explanation of why evaluative classifications appear to “outrun” classifications specifiable in independently intelligible non-evaluative terms. This paper argues that both ST and the outrunning point used to motivate it can be explained on the basis of more general factors that have nothing in particular to do with being evaluative. If so, there is no reason to expect ST to carry the sorts of metaethical implications that get attributed to it. I also show that my main argument is robust across certain complications that are raised by the context-sensitivity of many evaluative terms but have so far been ignored in discussions of ST and related matters.
Keywords Metaethics  Shapelessness  Evaluative concepts  Moral semantics  Anti-reductionism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2012.00877.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Themes From Kaplan.Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.) - 1989 - Oxford University Press, Usa.
Thinking How to Live.Allan Gibbard - 2003 - Harvard University Press.
Essays on Actions and Events.Donald Davidson - 1980 - Oxford University Press.
Mind, Value, and Reality.John Henry McDowell - 1998 - Harvard University Press.

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Thick Concepts and Underdetermination.Pekka Väyrynen - 2013 - In Simon Kirchin (ed.), Thick Concepts. Oxford University Press.
Shapelessness and the Thick.Debbie Roberts - 2011 - Ethics 121 (3):489-520.
How Are Thick Terms Evaluative?Brent G. Kyle - 2013 - Philosophers' Imprint 13:1-20.
Thick Concepts and Variability.Pekka Väyrynen - 2011 - Philosophers' Imprint 11:1-17.
The Sense and Reference of Evaluative Terms.Christine Tappolet - 1995 - In Petr Kotatko & John Biro (eds.), Frege: Sense and Reference one Hundred Years later. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 113--127.
Thick Concepts: Where's Evaluation?Pekka Väyrynen - 2012 - In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 7. Oxford University Press. pp. 235-70.
The Limits of Sentimentalism.François Schroeter - 2006 - Ethics 116 (2):337-361.
Must Metaethical Realism Make a Semantic Claim?Guy Kahane - 2013 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (2):148-178.
The Shapelessness Hypothesis.Simon Kirchin - 2010 - Philosophers' Imprint 10.
Evaluative Vs. Deontic Concepts.Christine Tappolet - 2013 - In Hugh Lafollette (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 1791-99.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
162 ( #31,947 of 2,214,617 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
70 ( #3,218 of 2,214,617 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature