Terminal sedation and the "imminence condition"

Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (2):69-72 (2008)
Abstract
“Terminal sedation” refers to the use of sedation as palliation in dying patients with a terminal diagnosis. Although terminal sedation has received widespread legal and ethical justification, the practice remains ethically contentious, particularly as some hold that it foreseeably hastens death. It has been proposed that empirical studies show that terminal sedation does not hasten death, or that even if it may hasten death it does not do so in a foreseeable way. Nonetheless, it is clear that providing terminal sedation in combination with the withholding or withdrawing of life-prolonging treatments such as fluid and nutrition can foreseeably hasten death significantly—what is here called early terminal sedation . There are ethical justifications for the use of sedation in palliative care and thus it would seem that ETS is an ethically and legally acceptable practice. However, what emerges from the literature is the repeated assertion that terminal sedation must be restricted to use in imminently dying patients—the “imminence condition”—and that therefore ETS is unacceptable. This restriction has taken on greater significance with the trend of palliative care to include the care of patients who are not imminently dying. This paper proposes to show that although there is widespread intuitive support for the imminence condition, it does not follow from the justifications for sedation as palliation, and that explicit arguments for the imminence condition are needed
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.2006.019224
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,781
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Medical Ethics and Double Effect: The Case of Terminal Sedation.Joseph Boyle - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (1):51-60.
Terminal Sedation: Pulling the Sheet Over Our Eyes.Margaret P. Battin - 2008 - Hastings Center Report 38 (5):pp. 27-30.
Terminal Sedation: An Emotional Decision in End-of-Life Care.S. N. Etkind - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (8):508-509.
Terminal Sedation as Palliative Care: Revalidating a Right to a Good Death.George P. Smith - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4):382-387.
Terminal Suffering and the Ethics of Palliative Sedation.Ben A. Rich - 2012 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (1):30-39.
The Double Life of Double Effect.Alison McIntyre - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (1):61-74.
Discussion.W. S., H. A. & E. Kemmann - 1998 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 29 (4):639-652.
Added to PP index
2010-08-24

Total downloads
18 ( #279,871 of 2,199,426 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #299,438 of 2,199,426 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature