A Modest Word in Defense of Aristotle’s Logic

The Monist 52 (2):210-228 (1968)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is fashionable now-a-days to regard Aristotle’s logic as being the skeleton in the closet of Aristotelian philosophy. As Miss Anscombe has acidly remarked, “Aristotle himself … misconceived the importance of the categorical syllogism, supposing that the theory of it gave him the key to the nature of scientific knowledge. He expresses this view in what I find his worst book: Book I of the Posterior Analytics.”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant’s General Logic and Aristotle.Kurt Mosser - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 16:181-189.
Cause and Because in Aristotle.G. R. G. Mure - 1975 - Philosophy 50 (193):356 - 357.
In defense of modest probabilism.Mark Kaplan - 2010 - Synthese 176 (1):41 - 55.
A Modest Defense of “Bad Old Logic”.Kenneth R. Merrill - 1982 - New Scholasticism 56 (4):500-512.
The Scope of Aristotle’s Defense of the Principle of Non-contradiction.Michael Degnan - 1999 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 73:81-97.
Aristotle and Logical Theory.Jonathan Lear - 1980 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Aristotle: a contemporary appreciation.Henry Babcock Veatch - 1974 - Bloomington,: Indiana University Press.
Uselesness: A Panegyric.David C. K. Curry - 2013 - The Good Society 22 (2).

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-21

Downloads
79 (#206,954)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references