The death of whole-brain death: The plague of the disaggregators, somaticists, and mentalists

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (4):353 – 378 (2005)
Abstract
In its October 2001 issue, this journal published a series of articles questioning the Whole-Brain-based definition of death. Much of the concern focused on whether somatic integration - a commonly understood basis for the whole-brain death view - can survive the brain's death. The present article accepts that there are insurmountable problems with whole-brain death views, but challenges the assumption that loss of somatic integration is the proper basis for pronouncing death. It examines three major themes. First, it accepts the claim of the "disaggregators" that some behaviors traditionally associated with death can be unbundled, but argues that other behaviors (including organ procurement) must continue to be associated. Second, it rejects the claims of the "somaticists," that the integration of the body is critical, arguing instead for equating death with the irreversible loss of "embodied consciousness," that is, the loss of integration of bodily and mental function. Third, it defends higher-brain views against the charge that they are necessarily "mentalist," that is, that they equate death with losing some mental function such as consciousness or personhood. It argues, instead, for the integration of bodily and mental function as the critical feature of human life and that its irreversible loss constitutes death.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/03605310591008504
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,165
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Is It Time to Abandon Brain Death?Robert D. Truog - 1997 - Hastings Center Report 27 (1):29-37.
Philosophical Debates About the Definition of Death: Who Cares?Stuart J. Youngner & Robert M. Arnold - 2001 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (5):527 – 537.
Beyond Brain Death?Amir Halevy - 2001 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (5):493 – 501.
The Dead Donor Rule: True by Definition.Robert M. Veatch - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (1):10 – 11.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Whither Brain Death?James L. Bernat - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (8):3-8.
A Defense of Brain Death.Nada Gligorov - 2016 - Neuroethics 9 (2):119-127.

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

78 ( #67,487 of 2,172,020 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #173,295 of 2,172,020 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums