Two logics

Evanston,: Northwestern University Press (1969)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This book is a consideration of the differences between Aristotelian and symbolic logic and the consequences these have for how we view the world. What Veatch propose is to try to exhibit with respect to several of the key logical tools and devices propositions, inductive and deductive arguments, scientific and historical explanations, definitions, etc. how these several instruments are differently conceived, both as to their natures and their functions, in each of these respective logics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kripke semantics for modal substructural logics.Norihiro Kamide - 2002 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11 (4):453-470.
Combining logics.Walter Carnielli & Marcelo E. Coniglio - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Normal monomodal logics can simulate all others.Marcus Kracht & Frank Wolter - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (1):99-138.
A universal logic approach to adaptive logics.Diderik Batens - 2007 - Logica Universalis 1 (1):221-242.
Modal translations in substructural logics.Kosta Došen - 1992 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 21 (3):283 - 336.
On Partial and Paraconsistent Logics.Reinhard Muskens - 1999 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (3):352-374.
A theory of hypermodal logics: Mode shifting in modal logic. [REVIEW]D. M. Gabbay - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (3):211-243.
Substructural Logics.Greg Restall - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-09-15

Downloads
4 (#1,595,600)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references