Reply on behalf of Joe

Sophia 48 (4):461-465 (2009)
This is a reply to W. Paul Franks’ critique (‘Why a Believer Could Believe that God Answers Prayers’) of my recent paper in Sophia (2007). I argue that Franks’ Plantinga-inspired criticism fails because it turns on the dubious assumption that the efficacy of prayer could provide evidence for the existence of God.
Keywords Efficacy of prayer  God  Veber
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11841-009-0127-2
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,133
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
In Defense of Pure Reason.Laurence BonJour - 1998 - Cambridge University Press.
The Nature of Necessity.Alvin Plantinga - 1974 - Clarendon Press.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
29 ( #181,283 of 2,191,816 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #290,783 of 2,191,816 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature