Reply on behalf of Joe

Sophia 48 (4):461-465 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a reply to W. Paul Franks’ critique (‘Why a Believer Could Believe that God Answers Prayers’) of my recent paper in Sophia (2007). I argue that Franks’ Plantinga-inspired criticism fails because it turns on the dubious assumption that the efficacy of prayer could provide evidence for the existence of God.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,594

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-09-28

Downloads
48 (#242,200)

6 months
1 (#418,924)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Veber
East Carolina University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Nature of Necessity.Alvin Plantinga - 1974 - Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
In Defense of Pure Reason.Laurence BonJour - 1998 - Cambridge University Press.
Metaepistemology and Skepticism.Richard Fumerton - 1997 - Mind 106 (424):782-787.

View all 7 references / Add more references