Reply on behalf of Joe

Sophia 48 (4):461-465 (2009)
Abstract
This is a reply to W. Paul Franks’ critique (‘Why a Believer Could Believe that God Answers Prayers’) of my recent paper in Sophia (2007). I argue that Franks’ Plantinga-inspired criticism fails because it turns on the dubious assumption that the efficacy of prayer could provide evidence for the existence of God.
Keywords Efficacy of prayer  God  Veber
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11841-009-0127-2
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,208
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
In Defense of Pure Reason.Laurence BonJour - 1998 - Cambridge University Press.
The Nature of Necessity.Alvin Plantinga - 1974 - Clarendon Press.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-09-28

Total downloads

29 ( #175,833 of 2,164,296 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #348,039 of 2,164,296 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums