The Argument from Abomination

Erkenntnis 78 (5):1185-1196 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The conclusive reasons view of knowledge entails the “abominable conjunction” that I know that I have hands but I do not know that I am not a brain in a vat. The argument from abomination takes this as a reason to reject the view. This paper aims to buttress the argument from abomination by adding a new sort to this list: the logical abominations. These include: “I know that argument is sound and that sound arguments have true conclusions but I don’t know whether the conclusion of that argument is true”. Two standard replies to the argument from abomination are raised. It is argued that the logical abominations open new holes in both

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,649

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Paley’s Argument for Design.Graham Oppy - 2002 - Philo 5 (2):161-173.
A Critique of the Legal and Philosophical Case for Rent Control.Walter Block - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 40 (1):75 - 90.
Rowe's Probabilistic Argument From Evil.Richard Otte - 2002 - Faith and Philosophy 19 (2):147-171.
The Vanishing Argument From Queerness.Lee Shepski - 2008 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (3):371 – 387.
The Assimilation Argument and the Rollback Argument.Christopher Evan Franklin - 2012 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (3):395-416.
A New Cosmological Argument Undone.Michael J. Almeida & Neal D. Judisch - 2002 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 51 (1):55-64.
Actors Are Not Like Zombies.E. Diaz-Leon - 2012 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 112 (1pt1):115-122.
A New Argument for Animalism.Stephan Blatti - 2012 - Analysis 72 (4):685-690.
Belief in Miracles: Tillotson's Argument Against Transubstantiation as a Model for Hume. [REVIEW]Michael Levine - 1988 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 23 (3):125 - 160.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-09-11

Downloads
77 (#155,902)

6 months
1 (#419,510)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Veber
East Carolina University

References found in this work

Philosophical Explanations.Robert Nozick - 1981 - Harvard University Press.
Knowledge and Lotteries.John Hawthorne - 2003 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Solving the Skeptical Problem.Keith DeRose - 1995 - Philosophical Review 104 (1):1-52.
Knowledge and Lotteries.John Hawthorne - 2005 - Philosophical Quarterly 55 (219):353-356.
Philosophical Explanations. [REVIEW]Robert Nozick - 1981 - Philosophy 58 (223):118-121.

View all 19 references / Add more references