Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (1):47 – 63 (2002)
This paper discusses the issues of deciding to have a child with mental retardation, and of terminating a pregnancy when the future child is known to have the same disability. I discuss these problems by criticizing a utilitarian argument, namely, that one should act in a way that results in less suffering and less limited opportunity in the world. My argument is that future parents ought to assume a strong responsibility towards the well-being of their prospective children when they decide to reproduce. The moral point in cases in which our acts affect the well-being of future children should be expressed strictly in terms of parents' culpability. Future children thus do not have current moral standing but presently living persons have current obligations to consider the presumable effects of their actions on future people. I will also argue that there are morally significant differences between 'selective contraception' and selective abortion.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Reproductive Autonomy Rights and Genetic Disenhancement: Sidestepping the Argument From Backhanded Benefit.Martin Harvey - 2004 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (2):125–140.
Balancing Procreative Autonomy and Parental Responsibility.Tom Buller & Stephanie Bauer - 2011 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (2):268-276.
Similar books and articles
What is the Wrong of Wrongful Disability? From Chance to Choice to Harms to Persons.M. A. Roberts - 2009 - Law and Philosophy 28 (1):1 - 57.
Preconception Care: A Parenting Protocol. A Moral Inquiry Into the Responsibilities of Future Parents Towards Their Future Children.Z. E. E. der & Inez de Beaufort - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (8):451-457.
Sex Between People with "Mental Retardation": An Ethical Evaluation.Ben Spiecker & Jan Steutel - 2002 - Journal of Moral Education 31 (2):155-169.
Insult to Injury: A Disability-Sensitive Response to Professor Smolensky's Call for Parental Tort Liability for Preimplantation Genetic Interventions.Alicia R. Ouellette - unknown
Harming as Causing Harm.Elizabeth Harman - 2009 - In M. A. Roberts & D. T. Wasserman (eds.), Harming Future Persons. Springer Verlag. pp. 137--154.
Parental Responsibility and the Morality of Selective Abortion.Simo Vehmas - 2002 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (4):463-484.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads62 ( #80,719 of 2,146,876 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #106,864 of 2,146,876 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.