Spin and Wind Directions II: A Bell State Quantum Model
Tomas Veloz, Sandro Sozzo, Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi, Suzette Geriente, Lester Beltran, Jonito Arguëlles & Diederik Aerts
Foundations of Science 23 (2):337-365 (2018)
Abstract
In the first half of this two-part article, we analyzed a cognitive psychology experiment where participants were asked to select pairs of directions that they considered to be the best example of Two Different Wind Directions, and showed that the data violate the CHSH version of Bell’s inequality, with same magnitude as in typical Bell-test experiments in physics. In this second part, we complete our analysis by presenting a symmetrized version of the experiment, still violating the CHSH inequality but now also obeying the marginal law, for which we provide a full quantum modeling in Hilbert space, using a singlet state and suitably chosen product measurements. We also address some of the criticisms that have been recently directed at experiments of this kind, according to which they would not highlight the presence of genuine forms of entanglement. We explain that these criticisms are based on a view of entanglement that is too restrictive, thus unable to capture all possible ways physical and conceptual entities can connect and form systems behaving as a whole. We also provide an example of a mechanical model showing that the violations of the marginal law and Bell inequalities are generally to be associated with different mechanisms.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Spin and Wind Directions II: A Bell State Quantum Model.Diederik Aerts, Jonito Aerts Arguëlles, Lester Beltran, Suzette Geriente, Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi, Sandro Sozzo & Tomas Veloz - 2018 - Foundations of Science 23 (2):337-365.
Spin and Wind Directions I: Identifying Entanglement in Nature and Cognition.Diederik Aerts, Jonito Aerts Arguëlles, Lester Beltran, Suzette Geriente, Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi, Sandro Sozzo & Tomas Veloz - 2018 - Foundations of Science 23 (2):323-335.
Spin and Wind Directions I: Identifying Entanglement in Nature and Cognition.Robrecht Vanderbeeken & Frederik Le Roy - 2018 - Foundations of Science 23 (2):323-335.
About a Generalization of Bell's Inequality.V. M. González-Robles - 2003 - Foundations of Physics 33 (5):839-853.
Quantum Entanglement in Corpuses of Documents.Lester Beltran & Suzette Geriente - 2019 - Foundations of Science 24 (2):227-246.
Bell Correlated and EPR States in the Framework of Jordan Algebras.Jan Hamhalter & Veronika Sobotíková - 2016 - Foundations of Physics 46 (3):330-349.
On the nonlocality of the quantum Channel in the standard teleportation protocol.Rob Clifton & Damian Pope - unknown
The Quantum World is not Built up from Correlations.Michael Seevinck - 2006 - Foundations of Physics 36 (10):1573-1586.
From Quantum State Targeting to Bell Inequalities.H. Bechmann-Pasquinucci - 2005 - Foundations of Physics 35 (11):1787-1804.
On Selective Influences, Marginal Selectivity, and Bell/CHSH Inequalities.Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov & Janne V. Kujala - 2014 - Topics in Cognitive Science 6 (1):121-128.
Philosophical Implications of Bell's Theorem.Niall Shanks - 1987 - Dissertation, University of Alberta (Canada)
Bell’s Nonlocality in a General Nonsignaling Case: Quantitatively and Conceptually.Elena R. Loubenets - 2017 - Foundations of Physics 47 (8):1100-1114.
“Local Realism”, Bell’s Theorem and Quantum “Locally Realistic” Inequalities.Elena R. Loubenets - 2005 - Foundations of Physics 35 (12):2051-2072.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-01-25
Downloads
12 (#805,104)
6 months
1 (#447,993)
2019-01-25
Downloads
12 (#805,104)
6 months
1 (#447,993)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Quantum Structure in Cognition: Human Language as a Boson Gas of Entangled Words.Diederik Aerts & Lester Beltran - 2020 - Foundations of Science 25 (3):755-802.
Quantum Structure in Cognition: Human Language as a Boson Gas of Entangled Words.Diederik Aerts & Lester Beltran - 2020 - Foundations of Science 25 (3):755-802.
On the Conceptuality Interpretation of Quantum and Relativity Theories.Diederik Aerts, Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi, Sandro Sozzo & Tomas Veloz - 2020 - Foundations of Science 25 (1):5-54.
On the Conceptuality Interpretation of Quantum and Relativity Theories.Tomas Veloz, Sandro Sozzo, Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi & Diederik Aerts - 2020 - Foundations of Science 25 (1):5-54.
Quantum Structure in Cognition: Human Language as a Boson Gas of Entangled Words.Diederik Aerts & Lester Beltran - 2020 - Foundations of Science 25 (3):755-802.
References found in this work
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky & Nathan Rosen - 1935 - Physical Review (47):777-780.
Can quantum probability provide a new direction for cognitive modeling?Emmanuel M. Pothos & Jerome R. Busemeyer - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):255-274.
Concepts and Their Dynamics: A Quantum‐Theoretic Modeling of Human Thought.Diederik Aerts, Liane Gabora & Sandro Sozzo - 2013 - Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (4):737-772.
A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors.Jerome R. Busemeyer, Emmanuel M. Pothos, Riccardo Franco & Jennifer S. Trueblood - 2011 - Psychological Review 118 (2):193-218.
The Potential of Using Quantum Theory to Build Models of Cognition.Zheng Wang, Jerome R. Busemeyer, Harald Atmanspacher & Emmanuel M. Pothos - 2013 - Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (4):672-688.