Why conscious free will both is and isn't an illusion

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (5):677 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Wegner’s analysis of the illusion of conscious will is close to my own account of how conscious experiences relate to brain processes. But our analyses differ somewhat on how conscious will is not an illusion. Wegner argues that once conscious will arises it enters causally into subsequent mental processing. I argue that while his causal story is accurate, it remains a first-person story. Conscious free will is not an illusion in the sense that this first-person story is compatible with and complementary to a third-person account of voluntary processing in the mind/brain.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Agency, authorship, and illusion.Eddy Nahmias - 2005 - Consciousness and Cognition 14 (4):771-785.
The sense of conscious will.Gene M. Heyman - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (5):663-664.
Consciousness in meme machines.Susan J. Blackmore - 2003 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 10 (4-5):19-30.
How neuroscience accounts for the illusion of conscious will.Masao Ito - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (5):664-665.
The illusion of conscious will.Peter Carruthers - 2007 - Synthese 159 (2):197 - 213.
Is the illusion of conscious will an illusion?Robert J. Sternberg - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (5):675-676.
Frequently asked questions about conscious will.Daniel M. Wegner - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (5):679-692.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
275 (#70,138)

6 months
11 (#196,102)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Max Velmans
Goldsmiths College, University of London

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references