Is Peter Singer inconsistent in his ethics?

Cadernos Do Pet Filosofia 5 (10):45-52 (2014)

Authors
Abstract
Peter Singer in his Practical Ethics and in other works as well gives importance to reason in making an ethical decision. Thinkers question Singer’s consistency and employment of reason in his ethical decisions. Jacqueline A Laing talks about Singer’s inconsistency in her article 'Inconsistency and Consequentialism'. With reference to animal rights and abortion, she claims that Singer uses different yardstick, thus Singer is inconsistent. She remarks that Singer uses the notion of ‘sentientism’ for the defense of animal rights, whereas he comes up with ‘personism’ for human centered ethics. She claims that if Singer is consistent why can’t he use the same notion of ‘sentientism’ for animal rights as well as issues on humans like disabled human beings? According to her, this suggests there is an inconsistency in Singer’s work on ethical issues concerning animals and ethical issues concerning humans. As a corollary conclusion, she claims that Singer is biased towards animals. In this paper, the authors try to show that there is no such inconsistency. Contrary to her claims, the authors like to show that Singer uses personism in the discussions related to animals and similarly he uses sentientism in his discussion related to abortion and other human centered ethical issues. Therefore, Laing’s claims about Singer’s inconsistency and her following claim that Singer is biased towards animals need to be reconsidered
Keywords Peter Singer, ética, sencientismo, pessoalismo
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,201
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Practical Ethics.John Martin Fischer - 1983 - Philosophical Review 92 (2):264.
Innocence and Consequentialism.Jacqueline A. Laing - 1997 - In David S. Oderberg & Jacqueline A. Laing (eds.), Human Lives: Critical Essays on Consequentialist Bioethics. Macmillan. pp. 196--224.
Singer.Lori Gruen - 2009 - In Christopher Belshaw & Gary Kemp (eds.), 12 Modern Philosophers. Wiley-Blackwell.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Igualdade E As Implicações Do Problema De Singer.Valdenésio Aduci Mendes & Leandro Cisnero - 2004 - Ethic@ - An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 3 (3):239-253.
Rights, Interests, and Moral Equality.Meredith Williams - 1980 - Environmental Ethics 2 (2):149-161.
Interview - Peter Singer.Peter Singer - 2008 - The Philosophers' Magazine 40 (40):59-60.
Singer, Peter (1946-).Anthony Skelton - 2014 - In Michael Gibbons (ed.), Encyclopedia of Political Thought. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 3454-3455.
Is Singer's Ethics Speciesist?Roger Fjellstrom - 2003 - Environmental Values 12 (1):91 - 106.
Peter Singer a Dangerous Mind.Peter Singer & Serendipity Productions - 2003 - Serendipity Productions, Film Finance Corporation Australia.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-08-31

Total views
58 ( #153,752 of 2,289,860 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #74,902 of 2,289,860 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature