Reid's Discovery of the Sense of Balance

Journal of Scottish Thought 3:23 - 40 (2010)

David Vender
University of Tasmania
The sense of balance remains a Cinderella among our senses. Although the vestibular apparatus and the apprehension of motion, equilibrium and orientation which it serves has now been studied extensively and descriptions abound in textbooks on perceptual psychology, its key role in our agency remains neglected in philosophical accounts of perception. Popularly received wisdom on the senses also largely ignores balance and it has recently even been called 'the lost sense'. Recognition for the discovery of this sense should probably be accorded to Thomas Reid and his contemporary William Charles Wells. Both made crucial observations before the close of the eighteenth century. Since there is now a tendency to emphasize the role of the agent, brain plasticity, and the development of motor skills in all perceptual tasks, some of Reid's comments in particular strike us as remarkably modern. Reid also differs from many authorities in crediting the sense with specific sensations, as would be expected given the role of sensations in his epistemological scheme. In this paper some of the fascinating facts about the sense of balance are reviewed so that Reid's remarks can be evaluated in a modern context. Similarities and differences in the approaches of Wells and Reid are considered and the value that Reid's insights have even now in understanding perceptual processes is explored. It is suggested that Reid should indeed be counted among the hitherto unacknowledged discoverers of this fundamental sense.
Keywords perception  senses  epistemology  Thomas Reid  vestibular  balance
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Function of Sensations in Reid.Todd Buras - 2009 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (3):pp. 329-353.
Thomas Reid on Acquired Perception.Rebecca Copenhaver - 2010 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (3):285-312.
Thomas Reid and Non-Euclidean Geometry.Amit Hagar - 2002 - Reid Studies 5 (2):54-64.
The Perception of Shape.David H. Sanford - 1983 - In Carl Ginet & Sydney Shoemaker (eds.), Knowledge And Mind: Phil Essays. Oxford University Press.
What Sort of Epistemological Realist Was Thomas Reid?Nicholas Wolterstorff - 2006 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 4 (2):111-124.
Thomas Reid's Theory of Perception.Ryan Nichols - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
The Problem with Reid's Direct Realism.Todd Buras - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (209):457-477.
A Defence of Scottish Common Sense.Michael Pakaluk - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (209):564-581.
Thomas Reid's Direct Realism.Rebecca Copenhaver - 2000 - Reid Studies 4 (1):17-34.
Thomas Reid on Aesthetic Perception.Rebecca Copenhaver - 2015 - In Todd Buras & Rebecca Copenhaver (eds.), Thomas Reid on Mind, Knowledge and Value. pp. 124-138.
Reid on Consciousness: Hop, Hot or For?Rebecca Copenhaver - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (229):613-634.


Added to PP index

Total views
348 ( #18,678 of 2,310,669 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #38,665 of 2,310,669 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature