Topoi 27 (1-2):73-86 (2008)

Bruno Verbeek
Leiden University
David Lewis’ Convention has been a major source of inspiration for philosophers and social scientists alike for the analysis of norms. In this essay, I demonstrate its usefulness for the analysis of some moral norms. At the same time, conventionalism with regards to moral norms has attracted sustained criticism. I discuss three major strands of criticism and propose how these can be met. First, I discuss the criticism that Lewis conventions analyze norms in situations with no conflict of interest, whereas most, if not all, moral norms deal with situations with conflicting interests. This criticism can be answered by showing that conventions can emerge in those contexts as well. Secondly, I discuss the objection that this type of conventionalism, inspired by Lewis, presents moral norms as fundamentally contingent, whereas most, if not all, moral norms are not. However, such critics fail to appreciate that conventions are not radically contingent. Moreover, if one distinguishes the question as to why an individual should comply with a norm from the question whether the norm in question itself can be justified, a core element of the complaint of contingency disappears. The third objection to conventionalism concerns the way in which conventionalists justify norms. I argue that reflection upon the way in which according to Lewis norms are justified reveals a fundamental tension in his theory. Possible solutions to this tension all have in common that the complaint of contingency returns in some form. Therefore, this third complaint cannot be avoided altogether.
Keywords Conventions  Norms  David Lewis  Conventionalism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11245-008-9029-0
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,290
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Convention: A Philosophical Study.David Kellogg Lewis - 1969 - Cambridge, MA, USA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Morals by Agreement.David P. Gauthier - 1986 - Oxford University Press.

View all 41 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Convention.Michael Rescorla - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Limited Conventions About Morals.Marinus Ferreira - 2017 - Dissertation, University of Auckland
Naturalism and Moral Conventionalism.Cyril Hédoin - 2018 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 11 (1):50-79.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
159 ( #74,716 of 2,518,878 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,861 of 2,518,878 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes