Cloning: Revisiting an Old Debate

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 4 (3):227-234 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The debate about cloning that took place 25 years ago, although directed toward a different sort of cloning, elucidates fundamental issues currently at stake in reproductive technologies and research. Paul Ramsey and Joseph Fletcher were participants in this early debate. The differences between Ramsey and Fletcher about the meaning and sufficiency of freedom, the understanding and weighing of good and evil, the connection between embodiment and personhood, the relationship of humans with nature, and the meaning of parenthood suggest both a broader agenda for the debate about cloning and a cautious move forward in the development of embryo splitting.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

To clone or not to clone--a Jewish perspective.J. H. Lipschutz - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (2):105-107.
Cloning and Infertility.Carson Strong - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (3):279-293.
Human cloning and the myth of disenchantment.Laurentiu Staicu - 2012 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 11 (31):148-169.
The ethics of human cloning.Leon Kass - 1998 - Washington, D.C.: AEI Press. Edited by James Q. Wilson.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
9 (#1,224,450)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Evolution of the Clonal Man: Inventing Science Unfiction.Peter N. Poon - 2000 - Journal of Medical Humanities 21 (3):159-173.
Human cloning and the hazards of biowonder.A. F. Cascais - 2001 - Global Bioethics 14 (2-3):25-31.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references