Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (3):187-191 (2018)

Authors
Marcel Verweij
Wageningen University and Research
Abstract
Some screening tests for donor blood that are used by blood services to prevent transfusion-transmission of infectious diseases offer relatively few health benefits for the resources spent on them. Can good ethical arguments be provided for employing these tests nonetheless? This paper discusses—and ultimately rejects—three such arguments. According to the ‘rule of rescue’ argument, general standards for cost-effectiveness in healthcare may be ignored when rescuing identifiable individuals. The argument fails in this context, however, because we cannot identify beforehand who will benefit from additional blood screening tests. On the ‘imposed risk’ argument, general cost-effectiveness standards do not apply when healthcare interventions impose risks on patients. This argument ignores the fact that imposing risks on patients is inevitable in healthcare and that these risks can be countered only within reasonable limits. Finally, the ‘manufacturing standard’ argument premises that general cost-effectiveness standards do not apply to procedures preventing the contamination of manufactured medical products. We contend that while this argument seems reasonable insofar as commercially manufactured medical products are concerned, publicly funded blood screening tests should respect the standards for general healthcare. We conclude that these particular arguments are unpersuasive, and we offer directions to advance the debate.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2015-103338
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,295
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Risk, Fear, Blame, Shame and the Regulation of Public Safety.Jonathan Wolff - 2006 - Economics and Philosophy 22 (3):409-427.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Wicked Problems, Complex Solutions, and the Cost of Trust.Julian Savulescu - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (3):147-148.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Wtf Who?James Stacey Taylor - 2015 - HEC Forum 27 (4):287-300.
Ethical Considerations in Presymptomatic Testing for Variant CJD.R. E. Duncan - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (11):625-630.
What Is the Proper Role for Charity in Healthcare?Felicia Ackerman - 1996 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 5 (3):425.
Paying Donors and the Ethics of Blood Supply.P. Rodriguez del Pozo - 1994 - Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (1):31-35.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-03-13

Total views
58 ( #183,690 of 2,448,730 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #447,034 of 2,448,730 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes