Gender Differences in Double Standards

Journal of Business Ethics 81 (2):281-295 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to investigate gender differences in the use of double standards in ethical judgements of questionable conduct instigated by business or consumers. We investigate if consumers are more critical towards unethical corporate versus consumer actions and if these double standards depend on the gender of the respondent. In the first study, we compared evaluations of four specific unethical actions [cfr. DePaulo, 1987, in: J. Saegert (ed.) Proceedings of the Division of Consumer Psychology (American Psychological Association, Washington DC)] instigated by either the consumer or the corporation. In a second study, we investigated the perception of some general consumer and corporate (un)ethical actions in addition to DePaulo’s unethical scenarios. Both researches show that females are less likely to use double standards when it comes to their own (un)ethical behaviour compared to corporate (un)ethical actions. Furthermore, gender differences in the use of double standards depend on the type of unethical behaviour. Limitations and suggestions for further research are discussed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,998

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Gender Differences in Double Standards.Iris Vermeir & Patrick Van Kenhove - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 81 (2):281 - 295.
Consumer Ethics: The Role of Self-Regulatory Focus.Tine Bock & Patrick Kenhove - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 97 (2):241-255.
Editorial Introduction: Towards a More Humanistic Management.Domènec Melé - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 88 (S3):413 - 416.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-21

Downloads
17 (#869,613)

6 months
8 (#362,344)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?