Journal of Global Ethics 4 (1):37 – 49 (2008)

Why should members of societies engaging in humanitarian intervention support the costs of that project? It is sometimes argued that only a theory of natural duty can require their support and that contractualist theories fail because they are exclusionary. This article argues that, on the contrary, natural duty is inadequate as a basis and that contractualism provides a basis for placing support for (justified) interventions among the duties of citizenship. The duty to support intervention is not, therefore, a competitor (of indeterminate weight) to our duties to compatriots, since it rests on the same basis. That is because exclusive citizenship can be justified only if social contracts can be iterated elsewhere and successful societies therefore owe assistance to societies that are immobilized by state abuse or state failure
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/17449620701855346
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,342
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Political Liberalism.John Rawls - 1993 - Columbia University Press.
Political Liberalism by John Rawls. [REVIEW]Philip Pettit - 1994 - Journal of Philosophy 91 (4):215-220.
On Nationality.David Miller - 2001 - Mind 110 (438):512-516.

View all 37 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
36 ( #263,633 of 2,326,054 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #650,227 of 2,326,054 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes