The Philosophers' Magazine 52 (52):105-106 (2011)
The multiverse is a hypothesis for which there is no evidence, and perhaps can never be any evidence. It is only since 1998 that it has leapt off the blackboards of a few physicists doing esoteric mathematics and lodged itself in the popular imagination. As is the way with popular science, it is easy to move from speculating that there might have been more than one big bang to proceeding on the basis that there has been more than one big bang
|Keywords||Applied Philosophy Contemporary Philosophy General Interest|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The One Paradigm to Rule Them All.Massimo Pigliucci - 2012 - In D. A. Kowalski (ed.), The Big Bang Theory and Philosophy.
Theism, Atheism, and Big Bang Cosmology.William Lane Craig & Quentin Smith - 1993 - Oxford University Press.
Should We Believe in the Big Bang?: A Critique of the Integrity of Modern Cosmology.Graeme Rhook & Mark Zangari - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:228 - 237.
Hartshorne's Process Theism and Big Bang Cosmology Revisited.Bryant Keeling - 2008 - Process Studies 37 (1):92-103.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads118 ( #39,019 of 2,143,792 )
Recent downloads (6 months)16 ( #31,513 of 2,143,792 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.