Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (2):235-261 (2011)
Two conditions guiding permissible use of force in self-defence are proportionality and success. According to the proportionality condition the means used to prevent an attack can be permissible only if they are proportional to the interest at stake.1 According to the success condition, otherwise impermissible acts can be justified under the right to self-defence only if they are likely to succeed in preventing the perceived threat.2 These requirements should not always be interpreted narrowly. Sometimes people are permitted to kill culpable aggressors in order to avoid a non-lethal harm. Sometimes people are permitted to take up arms to defend themselves against culpable aggressors they have little or no hope of ..
|Keywords||Contemporary Philosophy General Interest|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Self-Defense, Innocent Aggressors, and the Duty of Martyrdom.Whitley Kaufman - 2010 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (1):78-96.
Proportionality in the Conduct of War.Paul Gilbert - 2005 - Journal of Military Ethics 4 (2):100-107.
Explaining the Principle of Mala in Se.Morten Dige - 2012 - Journal of Military Ethics 11 (4):318-332.
Libertarianism, Self-Ownership and Consensual Killing.Peter Vallentyne - 2002 - Revue Philosophique De Louvain.
Tensions in a Certain Conception of Just War as Law Enforcement.Jacob Blair - 2008 - Res Publica 14 (4):303-311.
The Just War Index: Comparing Warfighting and Counterinsurgency in Afghanistan.A. Walter Dorn - 2011 - Journal of Military Ethics 10 (3):242-262.
Enforcement Rights Against Non-Culpable Non-Just Intrusion.Peter Vallentyne - 2011 - Ratio 24 (4):422-442.
Added to index2011-08-18
Total downloads24 ( #208,605 of 2,158,893 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #353,783 of 2,158,893 )
How can I increase my downloads?